Hays City, KS passes BSL

Previous alerts for Hays (city): http://stopbsl.com/?s=hays+city

http://www.kwch.com/global/story.asp?s=11497219

New Pit Bull Regulations in Hays

By Grant Meech (HAYS, Kan.)

“He is a good dog…”

Dunbar likes being outside and being around people, but Kayleen Geist’s 13-year-old pit bull is now a dangerous dog in Hays.

The Hays city council voted to define pit bulls as dangerous Thursday night.

“$50 is a little steep for registering your pet, but to actually have him in the house and have him still – they could have banned pit bulls altogether,” said Geist. “I feel lucky they are even trying to compromise.”

Hays defines dangerous as any dog with a tendency to attack or cause injury to people, has a vicious or threatening manner or kept solely for the purpose of dog fighting.

“It is sad to say but there is a typical type of person that could own a pit bull and you think they have a bad reputation which is not true at all,” Geist said. “It is all in how you raise a dog.”

The biggest complaint owners had was the singling out of pit bulls against other dogs.

“I am not opposed to this ordinance,” said one pit bull owner at the meeting. “If my dog got out and bit another dog or even killed another dog; there should be stiff fines for that. That is what this ordinance against dogs should be about, not trying to pick out one specific breed.”

Hays would also require owners to keep the dog on a leash at all times and build a fence or an enclosure at least six feet tall.

Geist said she wasn’t thrilled about it but it could be worse.

She added, “at least they are going to let us still have our pets.”

The Hays city council voted down an idea that would have required Pit Bull owners to buy insurance for their dogs.

Hays City, KS: Commission to discuss proposed BSL, Nov 12

Hays City Commission will meet on Nov. 12 at 6:30 to discuss proposed BSL against “pit bull” owners.

Previous alerts for Hays City: http://stopbsl.com/?s=hays+city

City Manager’s Office, P.O. Box 490, Hays, KS 67601
Phone: (785) 628-7320
Fax: (785) 628-7323

Ron Mellick, Mayor of Hays
rdcc@swbell.net

Christopher Channell, Vice Mayor
cchannell@media-net.net

Barbara K. Wasinger
barbwasinger@ruraltel.net

Troy Hickman
troy.hickman@hotmail.com

Henry Schwaller IV
hschwaller4@yahoo.com

http://www.fox4kc.com/news/sns-ap-ks–hays-pitbulls,0,1425755.story

Hays commission weighs ‘dangerous’ label, but no outright ban, for pit bulls

By Associated Press
4:01 AM CST, November 9, 2009

HAYS, Kan. (AP) — City commissioners in Hays could vote this week on strict new rules for pit bull owners.

Pit bulls would not be banned in the northwest Kansas community.

But a proposed ordinance would declare the dogs to be “dangerous” — a designation that would trigger several requirements.

Owners would have to keep any pit bulls confined securely, obtain insurance and provide identification microchips. They would also have to pay a registration fee of $50 a year, and keep the dogs muzzled and leashed if they’re out in public.

The commission is expected to take up the proposal at its meeting Thursday night.

Hays City, KS: BSL proposed

Hays City Commission meets to discuss the proposed ordinance (below) tonight, 11/5, at 6:30 PM.

Previous alerts for Hays City: http://stopbsl.com/?s=hays+city

City Manager’s Office, P.O. Box 490, Hays, KS 67601
Phone: (785) 628-7320
Fax: (785) 628-7323

Ron Mellick, Mayor of Hays
rdcc@swbell.net

Christopher Channell, Vice Mayor
cchannell@media-net.net

Barbara K. Wasinger
barbwasinger@ruraltel.net

Troy Hickman
troy.hickman@hotmail.com

Henry Schwaller IV
hschwaller4@yahoo.com

http://www.hdnews.net/Story/city110409

Commission going to the dogs

By KALEY CONNER
kconner@dailynews.net

Pit bulls still might be allowed within city limits, but owners soon could face stricter restrictions for keeping the particular breed.

When the Hays City Commission meets for a work session at 6:30 p.m. Thursday, it will consider an amended dog ordinance that automatically classifies pit bulls as “dangerous.”

“It’s not a ban,” City Manager Toby Dougherty said. “The commission was reluctant to enact a ban the last time they discussed it, but they did recognize that there was a need for possibly some further regulations other than what we have right now.”

This distinction would require pit bull owners to take additional precautions, such as providing the dog with an identification microchip, keeping the animals in secure confinement areas, and strict leash and muzzle requirements. Owners would be required to obtain public liability insurance in a single incident amount of at least $100,000.

If these guidelines are not adhered to, the dog could be subject to immediate seizure and impoundment. The owner could be fined or lose the license required to keep the pet in town.

Currently, dogs can be deemed “dangerous” only in court, usually following a biting incident or behavior issue. Dogs with a known propensity to attack or those trained for dog fighting also fall into this category.

This standard still would apply, but pit bulls would be the first breed automatically deemed dangerous. The ordinance lists several breeds of dogs commonly identified as a pit bull.

Another amendment would impose stricter penalties for pet owners who fail to register their animals annually by March 1. The delinquency fine would increase from $1 to $10 per month, with a maximum $50 fine.

The issue of regulating pit bulls in city limits surfaced in April after a pit bull attacked and killed a smaller dog, which was on a walk with its 10-year-old owner.

The proposed ordinance: http://assets.mediaspanonline.com/prod/3506971/pitbullrdinance.pdf

Dangerous dog means:

5) Any “Pit Bull Dog” which is defined as any and all of the following dogs:

a) The Staffordshire Bull Terrier breed of dog;

b) The American Staffordshire Terrier breed of dog;

c) The American Pit Bull Terrier breed of dog;

d) Any other breed commonly known as Pit Bull, Pit Bull Dog, or Pit Bull Terrier;

e) Dogs which have the appearance and characteristics of being predominantly of the breed of dogs known as Staffordshire Bull Terrier, American Pit Bull Terrier or American Staffordshire Terrier.

Hays City, KS update: BSL still on the table

Previous alert and contact info: http://stopbsl.com/2009/05/08/hays-city-ks-city-discusses-dog-breed-ban/

Next commissioners’ meeting: Thursday, July 9, 6:30 PM.

http://www.hdnews.net/Story/city070309

Commissioners discuss stricter pet ordinances

By KALEY CONNER

kconner@dailynews.net

It remains uncertain whether a ban on pit bulls and other dog breeds will be the Hays City Commission’s solution to a lingering controversy, but commissioners seem to agree stricter regulations are needed.

Commissioners discussed the issue of pet ordinances in-depth at Thursday’s work session and agreed to continue revamping the city’s existing dangerous and vicious dog legislation.

“The only conversation we’ve gotten is either completely yes or completely no,” Commissioner Troy Hickman said. “I wonder if there’s not maybe some ground in between.”

Commissioners discussed imposing stricter regulations on dog owners, particularly residents who choose to own a breed of canine that is known to be dangerous and those who do not register their pets.

Hickman suggested listing certain breeds, such as pit bulls, as dangerous dogs under city ordinance. This would mean pet owners would need to take additional precautions to keep their pet in town.

The issue of identifying these dogs also was discussed. Pit bulls can be difficult to classify based on appearance, and the word of an animal control officer or veterinarian is not always sufficient in court, City Attorney John Bird said.

Police Chief James Braun said the proposal is similar to legislation recently implemented by Wichita. Braun presented commissioners with additional research, including model ordinances other Kansas cities have adopted.

However, city staff does not have a recommendation whether or not Hays should implement a breed ban. Braun noted the situations seem to vary between communities.

“I’m here to tell you that whatever you decide, the police department and animal control will carry out,” Braun said. “I don’t have a recommendation one way or another, because I’ve got just as many people telling me we should do it as we shouldn’t do it.”

Besides legislation, enforcement was another issue commissioners discussed in-depth. The commission agreed a first step is to improve the city’s current law requiring residents to register their pets at city hall.

Braun said there are about 1,400 registered dogs in Hays, 21 of which are pit bulls. However, he also estimated there are as many as 5,000 dogs in the city, most of which are not licensed.

City staff was instructed to prepare an ordinance implementing stiffer penalties for residents who do not license their pets, and discussion will continue at a later date.

Commissioners heard from two residents, one of whom spoke against the breed ban, and another who favored it, noting her child recently was attacked by a pit bull.

The commission also was presented with a petition, containing almost 290 signatures, against the breed ban.

“If everybody was a good, responsible dog owner, and I don’t care what breed it is, and would follow a lot of the ordinances these other towns do by keeping any kind of dangerous or aggressive dog muzzled, locked up, that would solve this problem,” Mayor Ron Mellick said. “There again, a few bad apples spoil it for everybody. It’s just a hard decision.”

Discussion follows an April 29 incident in which a pit bull/mastiff mix attacked and killed a smaller dog, which was out for a walk with its 10-year-old owner.

Vice Mayor Chris Channell expressed concern for the safety of Hays residents and said steps must be taken to prevent future incidents.

“The goal I think we need to look at is reducing the potential harm to the public,” Channell said.

[Irrelevant text elided.]

Hays City, KS: City discusses dog breed ban

Edit 5/11/09: Per Henry Schwaller, the city “decided against a breed specific ban.” Whether this ends the discussion, or whether it will be up for discussion again in the future, is unclear. I suggest that concerned residents attend the next few commission meetings to make sure this issue will not be brought up again.

Next city commission meeting: Thursday, May 14, 7:30 PM
Commission meetings are held on the second and fourth Thursdays of the month at 7:30 p.m.

City Manager’s Office, P.O. Box 490, Hays, KS 67601
Phone: (785) 628-7320
Fax: (785) 628-7323

Ron Mellick, Mayor of Hays
rdcc@swbell.net

Christopher Channell, Vice Mayor
cchannell@media-net.net

Barbara K. Wasinger
barbwasinger@ruraltel.net

Troy Hickman
troy.hickman@hotmail.com

Henry Schwaller IV
hschwaller4@yahoo.com

http://www.hdnews.net/printstory/pitbulls050809

City discusses dog breed ban

By KALEY LYON

klyon@dailynews.net

Emotions ran high at Thursday’s Hays City Commission meeting as commissioners discussed whether to ban pit bulls in city limits.

After hearing from several residents, commissioners agreed to consider amending the city’s current dangerous and vicious dog ordinance to include stricter guidelines.

The issue will be brought back to commissioners in the future.

“Recent events made it very clear to me that it’s time we revisit our ordinance that dealt with dangerous dogs,” Commissioner Henry Schwaller IV said.

Discussion of the issue follows an April 29 incident in which a pit bull killed a smaller dog.

The other dog was out for a walk with a 10-year-old girl on the 300 block of West 16th. The girl tried to save her pet by picking it up, but she was not injured.

The girl’s father, Russ Pfannenstiel, shared his side of the story with city commissioners, asking them to consider banning the breed and boosting current ordinances.

He presented his research on the pit bull breed, noting they originally were bred for dog fighting.

While the question has been posed of where the city should stop if choosing to ban one breed, Pfannenstiel said banning pit bulls and Rottweilers would be a good start.

“My daughter made a comment to me this weekend about the possibility of getting another dog. Her comment to me was, ‘It’s just too bad I can’t go around the city block anymore,’ ” Pfannenstiel said. “I just please ask you guys, take safety into consideration first.”

Lindsey Miller, who owned the pit bull in question, also shared her experience.

Miller, a senior at Fort Hays State University, said she adopted the 95-pound, 5-year-old pit bull/mastiff mix through an online pet adoption site.

She was assured the dog had been evaluated for signs of aggression and thought she was doing a good thing by adopting a pet in need of a home, she said.

After noticing, however, the dog’s aggression for stray cats, rabbits and other small animals, she kept a muzzle over his face and used a chain choke collar, plus another leash, Miller said.

“I didn’t know he was capable of that,” she said. “If I did know that, I wouldn’t have adopted him. And I don’t think it’s fair for every dog in the city to pay for what my dog did.”

Miller has since had her dog put to sleep and said she has taken steps to apologize to the Pfannenstiel family.

Police Chief James Braun presented information from other Kansas communities, including a breakdown of which communities have enacted dog breed bans.

On average, police investigate about two dog bite incidents monthly, with about seven dangerous dog investigations each year, he said.

So far this year, six citations have been issued regarding dangerous or vicious dogs.

Commissioners discussed complications that could arise with banning the pit bull breed. For example, most dogs considered pit bulls are not purebred, said Pam Binder, a Hays resident and former veterinarian assistant.

“I’m not for a ban on any specific breed, because I know a few chihuahuas that are a little more vicious than some pit bulls I’ve met,” she said, suggesting alternate mandates like spaying and neutering, or higher licensing fees.

Binder also noted pit bulls have powerful jaws and attack to kill.

Another legal concern is whether the city could prove the need for a breed-specific ban, and how a pit bull would be defined legally, based on physical characteristics, City Attorney John Bird said.

“You can’t be breed specific unless you have data to prove that is a rational connection,” he said. “It was a problem then, and it appears to be a problem now.”

As a result of this obstacle, a previous city commission decided to adopt an ordinance based on behavior rather than breed, he said.

Bird also said it could require hiring an additional city employee to enforce such a ban.

City commissioners agreed they will continue to investigate the issue and possibly take steps to heighten dog ownership regulations.

“We’ve got a 95 pound dog that’s 5 years old; I bet Russ’ daughter isn’t 95 pounds,” Vice Mayor Chris Channell said. “That scares me. I don’t know what the answer is yet, but I think we need to pursue it and look at it and see if we need to make what we have stronger.”